AGA

Alternative Gravity Approach

  Zbigniew Andrzej Nowacki

 Lodz, Poland, December 2020

Here you will find access to the full version of the work Alternative Gravity Approach... that contains my theory briefly called AGA (from the first letters of its name). Below I would like to discuss the most important results for people who do not like to read scientific papers.

 They gave their left arm

Once upon a time, physicists had two hands each, just like other people, until one of them, very eminent, began to ponder this fact. "If these hands were of different lengths," he thought, "I could still somehow understand it, for I would do this with one hand and that with the other. But identical? I guess this is some unnecessary gift from Nature." He finally came to the conclusion that he should have cut off his left hand, and the other physicists, who admired him, did the same, and they were very proud of it. From then on, they did not have to wonder what to do with which hand, and instead of 'right hand' they just said 'hand'.

Of course, difficulties quickly appeared. The flagship theory of the well-known scholar soon after its creation began to give false results. Physicists wasted a lot of time and money trying to find a prosthesis to save the theory, but it never occurred to them that their troubles may have been caused by the lack of left hand. Finally, after a hundred years, a doctor (of computer science) took pity on them and elegantly sewed them these missing parts.

The story described above really happened. You only need to apply the following substitutions:

hand → mass

right → inertial

left → gravitational

My work shows that all three of these concepts – already introduced by Newton – are needed. There is no gift from Nature here because the two masses do not have to be equal. And this fact results in a strikingly simple solution to the problem of dark matter that has troubled physicists for almost a hundred years.

 Prose of gravitation

When the hero of Molière's comedy learned that he had been speaking in prose all his life, he was very pleased with it. Something similar can happen now whenever you replace prose by gravity. The point is that particle physicists have not dealt with this interaction so far because it is allegedly too weak. On the other hand, my work shows that some of them dealt solely with gravity throughout their scientific lives. And if I were them, I'd be really satisfied with such a turn of events.

 Coal

It is interesting what role coal plays in the reasoning of many people. If they do not know something, they often think that this can be explained by coal (possibly contained in carbon dioxide). For example, in the nineteenth century physicists thought that the Sun burns coal (nobody even dreamed about nuclear energy) and therefore the Sun will go out in 150 years' time (because they cleverly calculated that this fuel will only last for so many years).

It was horrendous stupidity, but even very wise humans (who, after all, were not lacking at that time either) believed in it. They thought this was a great achievement of science. When, around 1880, a young man named Max Planck came to a university in Germany with the intention of studying physics, the professor there strongly advised him against this, claiming that in physics virtually everything had already been discovered. Fortunately, Planck was stubborn.

Currently, the situation seems to repeat itself. Some physicists maintain that they already know everything, they talk about coal and argue that climate change is caused by carbon dioxide. However, in reality they did not make a full balance of the energy reaching the Earth. In the paper I show that there may be another cause that fits the experimental data better, looks much more interesting from the scientific point of view and is potentially more powerful than nuclear power.

Drama

Since I have already mentioned Molière here, let us remain in the theatrical convention. Alternative Gravity Approach... can be regarded as a multi-threaded scientific drama that ends a trilogy that also includes Quantum Nonlocality... and Grand Unification of Nature.... It is addressed mainly to physicists and should enable them to correct existing errors and avoid further ones. 

The spiritual fathers of the works are, respectively, the three great thinkers: Newton (gravity with its charge), Planck (light quanta and probabilities) and Copernicus (man's place in Nature). From a different – polemical – point of view, the first two correspond to general and special relativity. Unfortunately, Einstein did not write the counterpart of the third, nor did he give any method comparable to info-mechanics of Alternative Gravity Approach...  Its emergence was made possible by the culmination of a fundamental physical attitude, called 'wave-particle duality', initiated by Planck and continued by another great scientist, de Broglie. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle plays an important role here as well.

Info-mechanics is a powerful and extremely universal method (creating a new branch of quantum physics) that completely released information for the first time in history. It is difficult to overestimate the consequences of this fact. In my work, I have used it to formulate a quantum gravity theory that has been sought for almost a hundred years, but it will have a huge number of other applications, including immortality for all humans (except, of course, those who hold back the development of my ideas, as the people of the future will not need machinators).

The main character of my drama is, of course, AGA, who plays in several disguises. There is also Eve, who is suspected of having once initiated life on our planet. A slightly mysterious and still underage TIM is constantly moving around the stage. An important role is played by a guy who is called Sir. Something is said about the seventh dwarf that supposedly must exist. All the company have GUN and do not hesitate to make use of it. Unfortunately, some Higgs is liquidated.

Alternative Gravity Approach... does not contain, in contrast to Grand Unification of Nature..., any sophisticated proof. Unlike in Quantum Nonlocality..., no specialist quantum optics knowledge is required. Therefore, all persons with a certain maturity in the field of science are welcome to read.

Changing the name

Lodz, Poland, February 2024

Recently it turned out that expanding the acronym AGA as Alternative Gravity Approach was not appropriate. I found a fundamental contradiction in general relativity and described it in the final part of section 15 of the work as well as further in this text. It shows conclusively that curved space-time does not exist and we can now be 100% sure (no experiments needed) that Einstein's theory is false. Therefore, only my view of gravity remains on the battlefield and there is no alternative.

However, the acronym AGA may continue to be used, albeit with a different meaning. It should be understood as Additional Gravitational Amendments. This expansion reflects the fact that my theory makes corrections to Newtonian gravity. When in a system moving slowly (relative to the Big Bang, e.g. in the solar system or in our galaxy) the particle velocities are small compared to the speed of light and the distances between them are large compared to the so-called Planck length (this is a tiny constant), the AGA formulas transform into Newton's formulas which are correct in this case.

Curved space-time does not exist because time does not curve

Einstein claimed that gravity curves space and time, resulting in curved space-time. One can actually interpret, for example, the movement of the Earth around the Sun as a manifestation of the curvature of space. However, when it comes to time, the matter is more complicated. Below I provide a counterexample that everyone can understand.

On the Internet, on pages explaining general relativity, you may find, e.g., the following sentence: "Time passes faster for people living in the mountains than for those living at sea level." Compared to the duration of a human life, this difference is supposed to be very small, which makes it impossible to verify this effect (and that's what these propagators are counting on). Nevertheless, in relation to the time of existence of our planet the difference becomes greater than 24 hours. Let us try to examine this in more detail. 

Suppose that not long after the formation of the Earth two robots were installed on it: one on the top of, e.g., Mount Everest and the other at the foot of that mountain. If Einstein's hypothesis were true, i.e. time passed slower at the bottom, at some point (when the delay is about 12 hours) one of them would see the sun high above it and the other would claim it is deep darkness in the middle of the night. This would, of course, be complete absurdity.

If you show this text to people trying to defend general relativity (which doesn't apply to most physicists), they may begin to babble about proper time and argue that Einstein's hypothesis has been confirmed using atomic clocks. However, proper time does not exist in the quantum reality surrounding us, and in addition, to build space-time (which, as we well know, has coordinates), we need time measured using astronomical phenomena, i.e., the so-called coordinate time. On the other hand, atomic clocks placed at the foot of the mountain will actually be delayed, but this only proves that in a gravitational field they do not measure the correct time (due to their internal structure, which I explain thoroughly in the quantum theory contained in the work).

The above contradiction shows that general relativity is profoundly false (its fundamental object does not exist). Einstein was a wise man, but he did not exhaustively explore the after-effects of his assumptions. That is why we need to stop conducting research based on his theory of gravity as soon as possible, because it generates huge costs, but does not contribute to the understanding of Nature. 

Gravity is great again

By explaining gravity through the behavior of space-time, Einstein caused gravitational forces to become seeming, i.e. similar to centrifugal forces arising on a merry-go-round, for example. As a result, gravity began to be a kind of caricature of the field. In my theory – after the liquidation of curved space-time – gravitational interactions became real again (as in Newton's theory), i.e. similar to electromagnetic ones. And since at the same time gravity acts on a maximum of many particles and (in my works) is a model for other fields, we can say that it is the most important field. In other words, gravitation has become great again.

Show this to NASA engineers

Apparently they want to send a mission to Mars. But how can cosmonauts return safely to Earth if their understanding of time is flawed? How can this be possible if they don't want to use superluminal communications (e.g. n-radio, giving it up may be described by future generations as incredible stupidity)? In 2005, I provided the basics of this technology (without any contradictions), but it is not being developed as my works are not published (this is when psychopaths start ruling science). That's why people at NASA still think that time on Mars passes about three times faster than on Earth and they believe that nothing can travel faster than light (this was another fatal mistake of Einstein). And it's not funny anymore, because a great catastrophe is about to happen.

Other consequences

Einstein argued that curved space-time could have ripples that we would observe as gravitational waves. There were great difficulties with their experimental confirmation (some humans have lost their entire scientific lives on this), and now we know why. If something does not exist, its ripples cannot exist either. Nonetheless, it should be recalled that Nobel Prizes have already been awarded twice in great haste for the alleged discovery of Einstein's gravitational waves. We wish to believe that these were ordinary mistakes and the respectable Nobel Committee will want to correct them as soon as possible.

Similar remarks apply to the Higgs particle which is very closely related to general relativity. Following Einstein's example, the British scientist made unacceptable manipulations with the concept of mass. On the other hand, in terms of AGA – the only true theory of gravity – the existence of the Higgs boson makes no sense.

It's worth mentioning that another British scholar, Stephen Hawking, was looking for the correct approach to the problem of the most important field, he understood that a multi-universe environment was needed to achieve this goal, and warned that the Higgs particle might not exist. Today we see that Hawking was on the right track. And that is why this outstanding scientist, with many undisputed achievements, did not receive the Nobel Prize.

Liquidation

Above I wrote that 'Higgs is liquidated' and it has been literally confirmed. In April 2024, the sad news came that Peter Higgs was dead. He knew that the particle hailed as his boson was false, but he deluded himself that general relativity would nonetheless turn out to be true and his name would not be associated only with the greatest sham in the history of science. The contradiction I found could have shaken him dreadfully.

I must emphasize that I feel some remorse about this event. Peter was a very ambitious genuine scientist whose only fatal mistake was that he believed the wrong authorities. (Let us admit that this was the case for many humans.) I try to convince myself that Higgs could have passed away solely because of his old age.

There is no fairness in this world. The pseudo-scientist who dragged Higgs into this scandal is still living peacefully. I write a lot about him on the website, so here I will just add that everything could have turned out completely differently. If in 2005 or a little later he had offered me cooperation, I could not have refused. This would be very beneficial for this experimental physicist (he would have been a co-author of a great discovery long ago) as well as for other people. However, his gangster mentality took over and he decided to go for (i.e. to steal) the whole thing.

In Western civilization there is a lot of talk about the protection of intellectual property. However, this only occurs if someone wants to steal something from them. I would like to warn my fans that the greatest theft of intellectual property in history is brewing. The people who govern physics are waiting for me to die (for what purpose, other than stealing, have my perfectly correct works not been published for almost 20 years?).  Then it will turn out that my discoveries have been made by someone else, prepared to be a new genius. So what if it's a giant lie? Appropriate press releases will be issued and all newspapers will have to print it, just as they printed the information about the 'detection' of the Higgs particle.

It should be mentioned here that I presented the results contained in  Quantum Nonlocality... at an inter-university conference organized by Technical University of Lodz in 2006. Many humans from my university as well as from AGH University of Krakow saw that I was the undisputed author of the signal encapsulation principle. The paper was included in the conference materials and submitted to several journals. All my further works are related to this principle (without it they wouldn't be true). Nonetheless, after my death, the dishonest people who currently rule physics may try to impose their narrative on everyone. 

Take for example a physicist named Anthony Zeilinger. Although he received a Nobel Prize (actually a lifebuoy in my opinion), his scientific achievements are poor. They mainly involve the so-called quantum teleportation. However, firstly, it is extremely far from real teleportation (which will one day be implemented using info-mechanics), and secondly, most of the work in this area was done by scholars named Aspect (in 1981) and Clauser (in 1972). Zeilinger's experiment (in 1997) no longer contained any element of novelty. That's why I think he would love to have some real achievement. 

On the way to superluminal transmission

I mention those scientists not without reason. Aspect and Clauser (who rightly received Nobel Prizes) resolved a well-known dispute to Einstein's disadvantage and paved the way for my works. Using Bell's inequalities these physicists demonstrated that there must have been a superluminal communication between two entangled particles, but I have gone much further. By means of the signal encapsulation principle I have proved that such transmission does not lead to contradictions, and using info-mechanics I have shown exactly how these particles exchange information. By the way, I have received a number of practical applications. 

Scientific miracles

Now we know that no one before could even dream of obtaining such results. Truly I tell you: info-mechanics can perform scientific miracles. The explanation of quantum entanglement must be counted among them, alongside the quantum gravity theory, which has been called the Holy Grail of science. And what does the Nobel Committee do in this situation? They make a great move (really, I'm not kidding, read on).

The Nobel Committee for Physics has awarded the 2024 prize to two computer scientists who probably know as much about physics as I do about cooking (I just know how to heat something up). So why am I happy about this fact? Well, now nobody will be surprised that a computer scientist builds new physics that does not contain the errors of the old one (see the conclusion of Alternative Gravity Approach...).

Without acknowledgements

I wish to state that I wrote all my works entirely by myself, I didn't discuss them with anyone, and I even got by without a student. I also didn't need a physics teacher as I can read scientific papers in this field. Therefore, I am solely responsible for any errors. On the other hand, if now or after my death (when I can't deny) someone starts claiming that they helped me in any way, they will be an imposter (especially when it's a member of my family). This can be easily checked because they will have gaps in their knowledge that they will not be able to fill (I have not saved many important facts on any medium).